One reason programmers dislike meetings so much is that they’re on a different type of schedule from other people. Meetings cost them more.

There are two types of schedule, which I’ll call the manager’s schedule and the maker’s schedule. The manager’s schedule is for bosses. It’s embodied in the traditional appointment book, with each day cut into one hour intervals. You can block off several hours for a single task if you need to, but by default you change what you’re doing every hour.

When you use time that way, it’s merely a practical problem to meet with someone. Find an open slot in your schedule, book them, and you’re done.

Most powerful people are on the manager’s schedule. It’s the schedule of command. But there’s another way of using time that’s common among people who make things, like programmers and writers. They generally prefer to use time in units of half a day at least. You can’t write or program well in units of an hour. That’s barely enough time to get started.

When you’re operating on the maker’s schedule, meetings are a disaster. A single meeting can blow a whole afternoon, by breaking it into two pieces each too small to do anything hard in. Plus you have to remember to go to the meeting. That’s no problem for someone on the manager’s schedule. There’s always something coming on the next hour; the only question is what. But when someone on the maker’s schedule has a meeting, they have to think about it.

For someone on the maker’s schedule, having a meeting is like throwing an exception. It doesn’t merely cause you to switch from one task to another; it changes the mode in which you work.

I find one meeting can sometimes affect a whole day. A meeting commonly blows at least half a day, by breaking up a morning or afternoon. But in addition there’s sometimes a cascading effect. If I know the afternoon is going to be broken up, I’m slightly less likely to start something ambitious in the morning. I know this may sound oversensitive, but if you’re a maker, think of your own case. Don’t your spirits rise at the thought of having an entire day free to work, with no appointments at all? Well, that means your spirits are correspondingly depressed when you don’t. And ambitious projects are by definition close to the limits of your capacity. A small decrease in morale is enough to kill them off.

Each type of schedule works fine by itself. Problems arise when they meet. Since most powerful people operate on the manager’s schedule, they’re in a position to make everyone resonate at their frequency if they want to. But the smarter ones restrain themselves, if they know that some of the people working for them need long chunks of time to work in.

Our case is an unusual one. Nearly all investors, including all VCs I know, operate on the manager’s schedule. But Y Combinator runs on the maker’s schedule. Rtm and Trevor and I do because we always have, and Jessica does too, mostly, because she’s gotten into sync with us.

I wouldn’t be surprised if there start to be more companies like us. I suspect founders may increasingly be able to resist, or at least postpone, turning into managers, just as a few decades ago they started to be able to resist switching from jeans to suits.

How do we manage to advise so many startups on the maker’s schedule? By using the classic device for simulating the manager’s schedule within the maker’s: office hours. Several times a week I set aside a chunk of time to meet founders we’ve funded. These chunks of time are at the end of my working day, and I wrote a signup program that ensures all the appointments within a given set of office hours are clustered at the end. Because they come at the end of my day these meetings are never an interruption. (Unless their working day ends at the same time as mine, the meeting presumably interrupts theirs, but since they made the appointment it must be worth it to them.) During busy periods, office hours sometimes get long enough that they compress the day, but they never interrupt it.

When we were working on our own startup, back in the 90s, I evolved another trick for partitioning the day. I used to program from dinner till about 3 am every day, because at night no one could interrupt me. Then I’d sleep till about 11 am, and come in and work until dinner on what I called “business stuff.” I never thought of it in these terms, but in effect I had two workdays each day, one on the manager’s schedule and one on the maker’s.

When you’re operating on the manager’s schedule you can do something you’d never want to do on the maker’s: you can have speculative meetings. You can meet someone just to get to know one another. If you have an empty slot in your schedule, why not? Maybe it will turn out you can help one another in some way.

Business people in Silicon Valley (and the whole world, for that matter) have speculative meetings all the time. They’re effectively free if you’re on the manager’s schedule. They’re so common that there’s distinctive language for proposing them: saying that you want to “grab coffee,” for example.

Speculative meetings are terribly costly if you’re on the maker’s schedule, though. Which puts us in something of a bind. Everyone assumes that, like other investors, we run on the manager’s schedule. So they introduce us to someone they think we ought to meet, or send us an email proposing we grab coffee. At this point we have two options, neither of them good: we can meet with them, and lose half a day’s work; or we can try to avoid meeting them, and probably offend them.

Till recently we weren’t clear in our own minds about the source of the problem. We just took it for granted that we had to either blow our schedules or offend people. But now that I’ve realized what’s going on, perhaps there’s a third option: to write something explaining the two types of schedule. Maybe eventually, if the conflict between the manager’s schedule and the maker’s schedule starts to be more widely understood, it will become less of a problem.

Those of us on the maker’s schedule are willing to compromise. We know we have to have some number of meetings. All we ask from those on the manager’s schedule is that they understand the cost.

Via: paulgraham.com

Advertisements

A good nights rest!

July 30, 2009

BedBunker
BedBunker-1
Feeling unsafe during sleep time? Well now you can store your rifles and hand guns under your bed. The BedBunker provides protection for firearms and features fireproof up to 1533 degrees based on their testing, with high-security Mul-T-Locks, and is designed to replace the box spring under twin, queen, or king size mattresses and are compatible with most standard bed frames. The BedBunker is $2,200 for the double, and $4,000 for the king sized. Asta-La-Vista Boogieman!

Rain Choir

July 30, 2009

Just wait for the first ad.

These two British intellectuals will teach you how to think outside the box.

via buzzfeed

In a similar fashion to Guerilla Gardening, Eric Cheung and Sean Martindale have begun a project that aims to “activate public space and introduce nature to the urban environment in ways that might encourage others to do the same.” The two have even gone so far as to post the template for their ‘Poster Pocket Plants’ on their project blog in the hope that people will pick up on the concept. Part of the reason why they’ve been so widely accepted by the public is because they only make planters out of illegal billboards. 

20090709BBP01

20090709BBP03

20090709BBP05

via Torontoist

With more than 700 employees under their belt, Facebook had San Francisco firm Studio O+A, design them a new office. Here’s an interesting excerpt from architecture blog Otto Otto about the process –  “An advisory board of employees from every department collaborated with the design team on the design process, from space planning to finishes to final move coordination.”

lobby2

crane-table-microkitchen

design-area-2

sawtooth-area

via Otto Otto

Pandelephants?

July 21, 2009

After a newly born Panda cub took the Thai public by storm, zoo staff decided to paint several elephants as pandas and parade them around the streets of Bangkok in an effort to remind the Thai public that elephants – a symbol of their country, need attention and care now more than ever.

THAILAND-ANIMALS-ELEPHANT

THAILAND

tube

via rebelart

For the pedal-heads

July 16, 2009

What was once an old, automotive garage, Sable & Argent  is now a modern retail showroom in Woolloomooloo for everything bicycle. It’s at 85 Bourke St if you want to check it out.

storephoto

picture-001-2

Kick ass stop motion

July 14, 2009